WIP: Add ability to find duplicates #4

Chiuso
Flamey vorrebbe unire 2 commit da Flamey/findall:master a master
Flamey 4 anni fa ha commentato

I am quite scattered and probably losing 10-15 slots from stacks being split among inventories. Finds them all.

I am quite scattered and probably losing 10-15 slots from stacks being split among inventories. Finds them all.

I was thinking of implementing something like that.

Some general comments on your code:
I would like to have a -d or --duplicates parameter

The flag should make the search apply an additional filter to only find duplicates within the search result.

I dont think duplicating the search function is the way to go.

Ill check out the code in more detail later.

I was thinking of implementing something like that. Some general comments on your code: I would like to have a -d or --duplicates parameter The flag should make the search apply an additional filter to only find duplicates within the search result. I dont think duplicating the search function is the way to go. Ill check out the code in more detail later.
Flamey Titolo modificato da WIP: Add ability to find dulpicates a WIP: Add ability to find duplicates 4 anni fa
Flamey 4 anni fa ha commentato
Autore

The other thing that's important i found out is that we want to display results differently. I've been using it today to clean up and i really want 1 row per item/char.

Prism Powder/Flaahmie: Inventory(12), Mog Safe(3)
Prism Powder/Flamey: Satchel(3), Case(15)
Silent Oil/Flamey: Case(1), Sack(1)

The other thing that's important i found out is that we want to display results differently. I've been using it today to clean up and i really want 1 row per item/char. Prism Powder/Flaahmie: Inventory(12), Mog Safe(3) Prism Powder/Flamey: Satchel(3), Case(15) Silent Oil/Flamey: Case(1), Sack(1)
Flamey 4 anni fa ha commentato
Autore

Oh and I see options for ignoring complete stacks, ignoring equippable gear.

Oh and I see options for ignoring complete stacks, ignoring equippable gear.

After some more contemplating it makes sense to have a command like /findall_duplicates to show all duplicates and not only a subset by searching for characters or items. But I dont think it should integrate with the default search at all.
I would also only show stackable items.
I agree with you about the need to display results differently.
But this is findall it searches on all characters and the search results should reflect that.

After some more contemplating it makes sense to have a command like /findall_duplicates to show all duplicates and not only a subset by searching for characters or items. But I dont think it should integrate with the default search at all. I would also only show stackable items. I agree with you about the need to display results differently. But this is findall it searches on all characters and the search results should reflect that.
Flamey 4 anni fa ha commentato
Autore

Yeah i think it would need more work, but i do like seeing that i have darksteel ore scattered over 3 characters.

I think the main thing for duplicates is rearranging the output, default filtering to only stackable items.

I think an option to ignore complete stacks would be nice too.
Duplicates would be nice to default to current char, but multi char find is super useful.

Yeah i think it would need more work, but i do like seeing that i have darksteel ore scattered over 3 characters. I think the main thing for duplicates is rearranging the output, default filtering to only stackable items. I think an option to ignore complete stacks would be nice too. Duplicates would be nice to default to current char, but multi char find is super useful.

Hi,
I implemented a duplicate and stackable search in the addon.
Care to try it?

Hi, I implemented a duplicate and stackable search in the addon. Care to try it?
atom0s 4 anni fa ha commentato
Proprietario

Going to close this as it has been addressed fully in another pull request that has been merged.

Going to close this as it has been addressed fully in another pull request that has been merged.
atom0s closed this pull request 4 anni fa
Riapri questa pull request per effettuare l'unione.
Effettua l'accesso per partecipare alla conversazione.
Nessun revisore
Nessuna etichetta
Nessuna milestone
Nessuna assegnatario
3 Partecipanti
Notifiche
Data di scadenza

Nessuna data di scadenza impostata.

Dipendenze

Questo problema attualmente non ha alcuna dipendenza.

Caricamento…
Non ci sono ancora contenuti.